Which Green Rating System to Use?

This comparison chart evaluates global green rating systems to help architects, planners, and developers identify the most suitable framework for sustainable architecture projects.

Key Features:

Performance-Based vs. Prescriptive-Based Systems:

• Performance-based systems, such as Living Building Challenge and HQE, focus on measurable results like environmental quality and resource efficiency.
• Prescriptive systems, like LEED (USA) and BREEAM (UK), follow detailed guidelines and benchmarks.

Evaluation Criteria:

The chart compares factors such as:

• Sustainable Site Planning
• Indoor Environmental Quality
• Energy Efficiency
• Water Efficiency
• Materials & Resources
• GBI (Malaysia) and CASBEE (Japan) score highly in specific criteria like indoor environmental quality and energy performance.

Holistic Approach:

T. R. Hamzah & Yeang’s ecological design factors align with global standards, promoting eco-friendly building design that addresses human well-being, biodiversity, and carbon footprint reduction.

Scoring Framework:

Systems are rated on a 100-150 point scale, with Platinum and Gold certifications denoting excellence.

DGNB (Germany) and Green Star (Australia) emphasize economic quality and sustainability beyond construction phases.

Takeaway:

Choosing the right green rating system depends on the project’s goals—whether prioritizing energy savings, water efficiency, or innovative design. This guide ensures a balanced approach to achieving sustainability and regenerative outcomes in every build.